O1: account 2300 has always been used by the deposit GL code as the Customer
Deposits liability (resolved by number), but it was seeded/named "Payroll
Liabilities" for tenants the AccountingDepositsGL migration's NOT EXISTS guard
skipped — so the liability was mislabeled on the balance sheet. Rename 2300 to
"Customer Deposits" (IsSystem) and move payroll to a new 2400 account:
- both seed paths (SeedDataService.Accounts, SeedData)
- EnsureSystemAccountsAsync self-heal (renames only where still default-named,
preserving user renames; ensures 2400 exists)
- migration RenameDepositsAccountAddPayroll for existing tenants
Account number 2300 is unchanged, so the deposit posting code needs no changes.
O2: LedgerService never recomputed 4950 Sales Discounts, so "Recalculate
Balances" wiped it to JE-only and the Balance Reconciliation report showed false
drift. Add a 4950 section to GetAccountLedgerAsync and ComputePriorBalanceAsync
that reproduces the actual postings (invoice discounts DR + credit-memo issuance
DR, less the unapplied remainder of voided memos CR), matching AccountBalanceService.
Adds a LedgerService regression test for 4950. Documents both fixes plus the
remaining open findings (O3, O4) in docs/ACCOUNTING_AUDIT.md so the audit is no
longer lost. Build clean; 291 unit tests pass; migration applied.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.4 KiB
Accounting System Audit
Living record of the accounting/GL audit and its remediation status. Keep this file updated whenever an accounting finding is opened or closed — the original audit was lost once because it was never written down. Don't let that happen again.
Last reconciled against code: 2026-06-19 (branch dev, commits through 9532812).
Verification at that point: dotnet build clean (0 errors); dotnet test tests/PowderCoating.UnitTests → 290 passed, 0 failed.
How the GL is modeled (context for the findings)
Balances are computed two different ways, and they must agree:
- At posting time — controllers call
AccountBalanceService.DebitAsync/CreditAsync, which mutate the denormalizedAccount.CurrentBalance. - At report time —
FinancialReportService(Trial Balance, Balance Sheet, P&L, AR/AP aging, statements) andLedgerService(per-account ledger +RecalculateBalances) recompute balances from source documents.
LedgerService also backs the Balance Reconciliation report (the detective control added in
c2cd19e), which compares stored CurrentBalance vs the ledger-recomputed balance. Any account
whose recompute path is incomplete will (a) be silently corrupted by a "Recalculate Balances" run
and (b) produce misleading output in the reconciliation report.
Resolved findings (this audit batch)
| # | Finding | Fix | Commit | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | Sales Tax Payable (2200) was credited on every invoice but never relieved — the liability grew forever (no remittance flow). |
JournalEntries/SalesTaxPayment GET+POST: DR 2200 / CR bank, balanced, in a transaction, honors the period lock and validates amount + bank-account tenancy. |
0c921ba |
Posting reviewed JournalEntriesController:235-296. Reporting needs no change (posted JE lines already flow through TB/BS/ledger). |
| #7 | Most report queries relied on the global tenant filter, which is bypassed for SuperAdmin → cross-company leakage on P&L / Balance Sheet / Trial Balance / aging / statements. | Explicit CompanyId == companyId predicate added to every query in FinancialReportService. |
9532812 |
Confirmed: every query in FinancialReportService.cs carries an explicit CompanyId predicate. |
| #9a | A cash refund posted DR AR (control up) while the customer subledger went down — opposite directions → guaranteed AR drift. | Refund now reverses the sale: DR Sales Returns (4960) + DR Sales Tax Payable (tax portion) / CR bank; AR untouched. Split centralized in Core/Accounting/RefundAllocation.Split. |
2a82a1d |
Posting (InvoicesController.IssueRefund/CancelRefund) and both recompute paths (LedgerService §5b, FinancialReportService TB/BS/P&L) all use RefundAllocation.Split — they agree by construction. |
| #9b | Store-credit refunds & credit memos posted nothing to the GL on issue (only a CreditMemo + Customer.CreditBalance) → outstanding store credit invisible on the balance sheet. |
New 2350 Customer Credits liability. Issue: DR 4950 / CR 2350. Apply: DR 2350 / CR AR. Void remainder: DR 2350 / CR 4950. Updated in all 8 posting sites + TB/BS/P&L + ledger §12b. | 9ce3612 |
Posting sites confirmed (CreditMemosController 180-185/262-270/314-320; InvoicesController store-credit path). Reporting cmContraRevenue/cmIssuedNonVoided math reviewed. |
| — | No detective control to catch denormalized-balance drift. | Balance Reconciliation report (Reports/Reconciliation): per-account stored vs recomputed, plus AR/AP control-vs-subledger. |
c2cd19e |
Reviewed FinancialReportService.GetBalanceReconciliationAsync. NOTE: its usefulness is limited by O2 below. |
Original numbering gap
The commits reference findings #4, #7, #9a, #9b — implying a list of at least #1–#9. The original audit document was never persisted and is unrecoverable. Findings #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #8 cannot be matched to commits and their status is unknown. If the original list resurfaces, reconcile it here.
Resolved findings (2026-06-19 remediation)
O1 — Account 2300 mislabeled "Payroll Liabilities" while used as Customer Deposits — RESOLVED
- Root cause refined: there is no payroll feature posting to 2300; the deposit GL code has always used
2300 (resolved by number) as the Customer Deposits liability. Migration
AccountingDepositsGLalready renamed it to "Customer Deposits" for tenants that lacked a 2300, but itsNOT EXISTSguard skipped pre-existing tenants, leaving them mislabeled. The two seed files still created new tenants with the wrong name. - Fix (chosen approach: rename 2300, move payroll to a new 2400):
- Seed files now create 2300 = "Customer Deposits" (IsSystem) and a separate 2400 = "Payroll
Liabilities" —
SeedDataService.Accounts.cs,SeedData.cs. EnsureSystemAccountsAsyncself-heals: renames any 2300 still named "Payroll Liabilities" → "Customer Deposits" (preserving user renames) and ensures 2400 exists.- Migration
20260619233108_RenameDepositsAccountAddPayrolldoes the same for existing tenants (rename only where Name is still the default; insert 2400 where missing). Down is best-effort (soft-deletes only empty 2400s; does not re-introduce the mislabel).
- Seed files now create 2300 = "Customer Deposits" (IsSystem) and a separate 2400 = "Payroll
Liabilities" —
- Account number 2300 is unchanged, so the deposit posting code (
DepositsController,InvoicesController) needed no changes — its lookups are by"2300".
O2 — LedgerService never recomputed 4950 Sales Discounts → recalc corrupted it — RESOLVED
- Fix: added a 4950 section to both
LedgerService.GetAccountLedgerAsyncandComputePriorBalanceAsyncthat reproduces the actual postings so a balance recalc matches the stored balance: invoice discounts (DR at invoice date) + credit-memo issuance (DR full amount at issue) − the unapplied remainder of voided memos (CR at void). This mirrors whatAccountBalanceServiceposts atInvoicesController:849/1108/1629andCreditMemosController, so the Balance Reconciliation report no longer shows false drift on 4950. - Note / micro-discrepancy: the ledger uses
memo.AmountAppliedfor the voided remainder (matching the true posting), whereasFinancialReportServiceTB/BS derive the voided portion from applications against non-voided invoices. These differ only in the rare case of a voided memo applied to a since-voided invoice. Left as-is (report-side nuance, not O2's target); documented here so it isn't mistaken for a bug. - Regression test:
LedgerServiceTests.GetAccountLedgerAsync_SalesDiscounts4950_IncludesInvoiceDiscountsAndCreditMemoContraRevenue.
Verification of O1+O2: dotnet build clean; dotnet test tests/PowderCoating.UnitTests → 291 passed;
migration applied to the dev database successfully.
Open findings (deferred — to do after O1/O2 per user)
O3 — Write-path account lookups omit explicit CompanyId (defense-in-depth gap) — LOW-MEDIUM
- Finding #7 added explicit
CompanyIdpredicates to the read path, but several posting lookups still rely on the global filter alone, e.g.CreditMemosController(182-184, 268, 317-318) andInvoicesControllerrefund/credit account lookups useFirstOrDefaultAsync(a => a.AccountNumber == "2350" && a.IsActive)with noCompanyId.JournalEntriesController.SalesTaxPayment(246) does it correctly. - Impact: low in practice (these run under a non-SuperAdmin company context where the global filter applies), but it violates the repo's standing rule and would post to the wrong tenant's account if ever executed in a SuperAdmin/multi-company context.
- Fix direction: add
a.CompanyId == companyIdto every account lookup on the posting path.
O4 — Sales-tax remittance can over-remit (drive 2200 negative) — LOW
SalesTaxPaymentvalidates amount > 0 but does not cap the payment at the outstanding 2200 balance.- Impact: a typo can push Sales Tax Payable negative (a debit-balance liability), which is an abnormal balance that then surfaces oddly on the balance sheet.
- Fix direction: show the current 2200 balance (already shown on the GET form) and reject/warn when
amountexceeds it.
Suggested priority order
- O1 (mislabeled/commingled liability — real balance-sheet correctness issue)
- O2 (recalc corruption + reconciliation report reliability)
- O3 (defense-in-depth on write path)
- O4 (input guard)